PULASKI AND MIDDLEMAN FREE

military troops have filed claims accusing Combat Arms Earplugs manufacturer 3M of knowing the personal protection devices were improperly made and failed to protect the users’ hearing from the concussive impulses of machinery, weaponry, and warfare. In contrast, Asbestos product liability MDL, pending since 1991, has about 192,000 actions. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Statistics report shows that 3M earplug litigation has grown to 203,722 total actions. According to the website, such falls have led to injuries that include skull fractures and concussions.Īt Pulaski & Middleman, L.L.C., our defective drugs lawyers and product recall attorneys are experienced in investigating and uncovering critical evidence when innocent victims are injured or killed by the medicines and medical devices they unknowingly trust.Multidistrict litigation involving 3M Combat Arms earplugs issued to military personnel for years has grown to become the largest MDL ever, and attorneys expect lawsuits to continue to grow. The agency also reported on its website that infants were able to fall from the seats by arching their back, leaning forward or sideways, or rocking back and forth. The CPSC reported that in each case, the injuries resulted both when babies fell from a Bumbo infant seat after it had been placed on an elevated surface above the floor, and also when the seat was being used at floor level. An article previously posted on Bumbo's website referred to an earlier 2007 recall of the Bumbo Baby Sitter as 'The Lamest Recall in the History of the World'. While Bumbo's adherence to the 2012 recall was considered voluntary, it was likely not without indignation. Another photo appeared to depict a mother sitting next to her unsecured baby in a Bumbo Baby Sitter on a table. One image showed several babies using the product at a birthday party, sitting on a table, unsecured by any type of restraint. The original packaging also depicted images of unattended babies sitting in Bumbo Baby Sitters on what appeared to many as elevated surfaces. Prior to the recall and name change, the company simply listed the product as the 'Bumbo Baby Sitter,', and the product did not include any type of restraining harness or seatbelt. Since the recall, Bumbo International changed the name of the product to 'Bumbo Floor Seat.' The CPSC has urged, 'Even with the belt, the seat should never be used on any raised surface.'

In addition to the safety restraint attachment, stickers are also provided warning that the seats should only be used at floor level. The August 2012 recall of nearly 4 million Bumbo seats states that babies between 3 and 10 months of age are most at risk, and parents and other attending adults should immediately cease using the seats until they have been outfitted with the seatbelt made available in conjunction with the recent recall.

PULASKI AND MIDDLEMAN FREE

Pulaski & Middleman is offering free Bumbo lawsuit case evaluations in the event that a child is injured after falling out of a Bumbo Baby Sitter. They should not be allowed to sell a product by depicting its use on elevated surfaces and tables as safe, and then after children are injured in those situations avoid negligence by pointing to their small-print informational inserts.' According to the lawsuit, the Bumbo Baby Sitters, which were sold prior to the August 2012 recall, did not include any type of safety restraint and were being used in manners which were completely consistent with Bumbo's marketing.Īdam Pulaski, a partner at Pulaski & Middleman, a Houston-based, products liability law firm that handles Bumbo Baby Seat Lawsuits stated, 'Bumbo doesn't get to have it both ways. HOUSTON, TX, Ma/24-7PressRelease/ - Three new product liability lawsuits were filed last week in Texas against Bumbo International Trust and Target for children who fell from the Bumbo Baby Sitter and suffered significant head injuries.

Pulaski and middleman